Florida Bar's Ethics Opinion 24-1: Ethical Use of Generative AI in Legal Practice
- Mark Heftler
- Feb 5, 2024
- 2 min read
The legal profession stands at a crossroads, with technological advancements introducing both opportunities and challenges. The Florida Bar's Ethics Opinion 24-1, issued on January 19, 2024, underscores the significance of navigating these advancements ethically, particularly the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI). This post explores the opinion's guidance, focusing on billables, oversight, and confidentiality, illustrating the ethical landscape for legal professionals leveraging AI.
Confidentiality and Oversight
The Opinion emphasizes the paramount importance of client confidentiality, a cornerstone of legal ethics. Lawyers are reminded of their duty to protect client information when using generative AI, necessitating an understanding of the technology's data handling practices. As one quote from the Opinion highlights, "Lawyers must ensure that the confidentiality of client information is protected when using generative AI". This includes being vigilant about how AI programs manage, share, and potentially learn from the data inputted into them.
Oversight is equally critical. The Opinion outlines that lawyers must develop policies and practices to ensure their use of generative AI aligns with ethical obligations. Lawyers are responsible for their work product and professional judgment, regardless of AI's involvement, and must verify the accuracy and appropriateness of the AI-generated outputs.
Ethical Billing Practices
The guidance on billing practices stands out for its relevance and immediacy. The Opinion advises against improper billing practices like double-billing or inflating billable hours due to AI's efficiency. "Use of generative AI does not permit a lawyer to engage in improper billing practices such as double-billing". This guidance serves as a reminder of the ethical imperative to charge clients fairly and transparently, ensuring that any efficiencies gained from AI benefit the client as well.
An Opinionated Take on Billables
The Opinion's stance on billing practices is particularly commendable. It acknowledges the potential for AI to enhance efficiency but cautions against allowing this to distort billing. This balanced approach encourages innovation while maintaining ethical billing, ensuring that the advantages of AI are shared with clients. It's a forward-thinking perspective that aligns with the profession's foundational ethics, ensuring that technology serves to enhance, not undermine, the lawyer-client relationship.
Conclusion
As we navigate the evolving landscape of legal technology, the Florida Bar Ethics Opinion 24-1 offers a comprehensive framework for the ethical use of generative AI. By emphasizing confidentiality, oversight, and ethical billing, it provides a roadmap for integrating new technologies in a manner that upholds the profession's highest standards. For legal practitioners, the message is clear: embrace innovation, but never at the expense of your ethical obligations.
Disclaimer:
Comments